Firstly I think that I have developed hugely from my initial preliminary task to my final media product. The first thing I’ve noticed is the amount of white space/lack of content on the first product, although I would put this down to my lack of knowledge and confidence within producing a ‘college magazine’, because I personally knew more about the music magazine and the concept was something that was familiar to me this meant I could produce it to a much higher standard. Also the design and layout in my first magazine are of a poor standard as they are almost too ‘neat’ and the sell lines or any features of the page don’t particularly jump out at the reader, this whereas in the second magazine although there is a lack of sell lines there is plenty happening on the page to keep the reader interested and curious. Also the main image on the first magazine isn’t entirely relevant and doesn’t really make a statement or show a purpose, whereas the second magazine is based almost entirely around this main image and this is what everything else on the page revolves around. Also there is only one image included in the first magazine which means minimal media resulting in bad presentation, so in my finished product I used a number of images to even out the balance between text and images.
A you can see the my contents page has developed massively from my efforts for the preliminary and my final product. The research definitely helped me in terms of content and layout of a contents page and exactly what needs to be included. A lot more colour has been injected into my music magazine and therefore it is presented a lot better than the college magazine, there are no pictures on the first task as again I struggled for what content to include, whereas in the second one there is a big focus on balancing out the input of text and images so the page is more appealing and well presented.